FREN

Garoo


12 jul. 2004

Spooks 1.06: it’s still a good show, despite the all-too-easy spectacular season surprise ending, but there’s still something that bothers me. If secret services wanted to prevent the IRA from planting a bomb in the subway, or Al Qaeda from blowing up a nuclear waste warehouse with a pocket missile launcher, would it really be best to ostensibly evacuate the area before anything happens? I do understand that, once the terrorists have set plan in motion they won’t want to stop, but wouldn’t the coincidental evacuation of the target zone be first on the shortlist of reasons to halt and reschedule the operation?

Want to know when I post new content to my blog? It's a simple as registering for free to an RSS aggregator (Feedly, NewsBlur, Inoreader, …) and adding www.garoo.net to your feeds (or www.garoo.net if you want to subscribe to all my topics). We don't need newsletters, and we don't need Twitter; RSS still exists.

Legal information: This blog is hosted par OVH, 2 rue Kellermann, 59100 Roubaix, France, www.ovhcloud.com.

Personal data about this blog's readers are not used nor transmitted to third-parties. Comment authors can request their deletion by e-mail.

All contents © the author or quoted under fair use.