Hi! Do you remember blogs? Well, this used to be one. Now it just serves as an archive for my multiple Twitter accounts.
Wow — when I’d seen the screenshot, I thought it looked like him, but couldn’t be. Too serious, too broad-shouldered (the last movie I saw him in was Dodgeball — not as bad as I thought, by the way, but not reviewed because I missed half of it — and once again he was playing the little geeky shrimp), and too famous well not quite but recognizable at least by some well definitely not by name but still. And yet it is him!
And now he’s a Mac… I’m in love, possibly maybe.
(As for the commercials themselves? Bah. It’s a good thing that Apple’s advertising the Mac again, rather than just the iPod. It’s a shame they’re going the Switch route again, unconvincing as the previous batch was. But it’s hard selling a computer to the masses when its main advantages only become self-evident after a few days of use.)
Heh. A good surprise, finally. (Two, counting the fact we’ll never see… the scene that concluded a recent episode. Yeah, that’s terribly bad of me, I’m not proud, but that’s the way it is.)
When something like that happens to a character (or two), I always wonder — at what time was the actor actually notified? It certainly wasn’t planned out from the start, because it can hardly be a coincidence that those were the two actresses who’ve been recently arrested for DUI, not to mention the long-standing rumors that the producers wanted to get rid of one in particular. (Because, sure, they couldn’t have been drinking and driving after their termination, but the rumors about Rodriguez had started out long before that.) So, what do they do? Do they give them the script’s last page at the very last moment, or trust their professionalism? On the one hand, when you’re getting rid of someone because they’re unmanageable, you’re unlikely to trust them to be professional on their final day; on the other, if you save the surprise for the last morning, how can you expect them to shoot their scenes rather than throw a tantrum?
As if it weren’t enough that the episode sucks, and cheerfully (and as unsurprisingly as can be) recycles the same pathetic story twist they’ve already abused several times… now I just can’t bear seeing xxxx in that plain, stupid part now that I’ve finally seen the 13 episodes of xxxx (who wants to offer me the DVD? give me the DVD! give me the DVD!).
The end of a show is often disappointing, unworthy of the years of story arc that piled up before. We’re lucky here, on two counts: the writers know they have to conclude (which doesn’t happen often) (although they must have originally thought they’d have twice as many episodes to buckle up after Garner came back); and they’re working their asses off to keep up the quality of previous seasons. With great success. The last two episodes manage to be even more silly and contrived than all they’ve done before. And that’s a feat.
Je ne remercie personne de m’avoir prévenu que c’était encore un week-end de trois jours, parce que personne ne m’a prévenu que c’était encore un week-end de trois jours. (Bande de flemmards de salariés.) Ce n’est qu’en voyant l’Arc de Triomphe éclairé en bleu, encadré par les flots blancs et rouges de voitures sur les Champs-Elysée au clair de lune, que j’ai réalisé qu’il se passait quelque chose.On ne peut vraiment compter sur personne —- comment vous voulez que je sache que je dois prévoir à boire et à manger pour trois jours au lieu de deux_?! Vous croyez que je vais le savoir par moi-même, peut-être_? Genre, je prête la moindre attention aux jours de vacances de la plèbe.
Bon, sérieusement, Monoprix République est ouvert, cette fois, ou pas ? Comme je ne fais absolument pas confiance aux chiens que vous êtes, je n’accepterai pas de réponses sans preuves photographiques. Vous seriez capables de me mentir, sales cons.
Et puis pensez-vous que quelqu’un m’aurait prévenu que la pharmacie ouverte toute la nuit boulevard Sébastopol ferme à deux heures du matin ? Hein ? Non, vraiment. Je vous hais.
After Chicken Run, I expected the worst; but, actually, the transition to feature length is pretty much a success. Yet the series’ spirit isn’t wholly there: there’s too many humans and too much dialogue, Wallace’s inventions work a little too well, and the movie’s most memorable aspect, in the end, is just the little bunnies. (If they exist as collectible figurines, I’m interested. Well, I’m saying that to pretend like there are people somewhere dying to buy me presents if only they knew what to give me. It’s always pleasant, pretending.)
All in all a good movie, but Wallace and Gromit will be as good as in shorts. Although, come to think of it, I seem to recall I’d already been disappointed by the last short.
It’s so boring and creepy I thought I was watching a François Ozon movie.
In the “let’s do something with those assorted colored lights we ordered by mistake” series, tonight the Concorde obelisk was red.
In other news, my cameraphone is crap.
Ack. Bad software update, bad!
I hadn’t even noticed Mail.app was going to be affected by the update — but then, I don’t recall reading the release notes at all.
I continue to believe that the best reason to believe that Apple is going to do a mobile phone is that (a) you know Steve Jobs uses a mobile phone; and (b) there’s not a single existing mobile phone that’s good enough to make Jobs happy.
Or does he? Imagine the chain of events: Steve Jobs agrees to license iTunes to Motorola; then Steve Jobs sees what crap a Motorola phone is, and decides to limit the iTunes licensed software to one hundred tracks, because the ROKR isn’t worthy of Apple. That hypothesis only works if the Motorola phone is the first instance of a mobile phone Jobs has ever been closely exposed to — otherwise he’d have known in all of ten seconds that Motorola was the worst possible partner for this endeavor.
Apple thinks I am a whiny kid who looks like he sleeps under a bridge. A kid who murmurs snidely to himself. A kid who can’t grow a beard to save his life. Specifically, this kid.
Well, yeah. But he was cute in Jeepers Creepers, and he’s hot in those commercials. Perfectly fine with me. And, come on, you know he’s just the epitome of the Mac-using cool kid — and a young Steve Jobs’ slightly cuter, fitter alter ego. A perfect choice for the part.
It was off a good start — the two of them are cool together, and there was to be an important discovery.
Yet in fact there wasn’t, and it referenced one of the most prominent theories without confirming or contradicting it, and brought the whole hatch situation back to status quo by the end of the episode. Strangely reminiscent of the first season’s second half, when they multiplied red herrings in order to confuse the viewer into thinking that was a deep, mysterious story.
I didn’t want to see it in a theater. I didn’t want my viewing it to be counted in the box office and add to the money earned by Tom Cruise and J.J. Abrams. (To be precise, I didn’t want to earn Tom Cruise money, and be counted in Abrams’ box office.) But someone forced me.
The movie is exactly what you might expect: a neverending Alias episode, that you have to suffer through whole, sitting tight in a cramped room that’s stinking of malfunctioning air conditioning: the prologue showing one of the supposedly most intense scenes from the end of the movie, the Apple Store headquarters complete with mysterious big boss and clumsy geek, the desperate need to live a normal life filled with corny sentimental crap, the location shoots and huge-budget action scenes. Uh, no, wait, Alias does blue screens and cheap tricks (except two weeks ago, when they apparently sent one of the actors to Paris in order to shoot a small, unimportant scene with Elodie Bouchez, who I suppose was stuck in France for work), but the scenes are exactly the same as have only been written for the series, except this time everything’s on film because Abrams can afford to show it for real.
But you do get the whole package: the poorly-written excuse for a script (which wouldn’t be so bad if the rest made up for it), the ridiculous great joys and great sorrows of a big-hearted undercover agent (which wouldn’t be so bad if you could feel any emotional connection to the character — but how could you when Tom Cruise looks so fake playing happy husband? he looks like he’s posing with Katie Holmes), and millions and millions of dollars’ worth of action filmed by someone with little to no experience at that — yeah, they’re jumpy and all, but very confused and a tremendous waste of money that could have been so much better used by a somewhat talented director.
In short, it wholly deserves to fail — and it doesn’t matter if the audience is skipping it because of Tom Cruise’s antics and not intrinsic quality; it’s the result that matters.
Mhh, I don’t know. I didn’t get hooked on to Firefly immediately either, so I’ll hold my final judgment until I see the movie again, possibly after the last few episodes of the show, but I’m afraid its spirit has gotten a bit lost amidst the dollars (not that there were that many of them, either). River is a bit too sharp when she escapes, Mal is a bit too cold (back to his personality in the pilot, as if nothing had happened since), Kaylee a bit too transparent, the Reavers too present on-screen (they were so much more impressive when you wouldn’t see them) and their involvement in the story much too obvious, the bad guy is a bit too reminiscent of the before-last episode, and… the Alliance wanted River back so much just because of that?! Give me a break! (And where are the blue-gloved men?)
A quick Google search tells me that the Wii has USB, so it’s quite likely the “wand” (the apparatus that you put on top of your TV and that seems to triangulate, or, uh… biangulate the controller positions, and likely also serves as an antenna) would be a USB device (worst case scenario, using a proprietary connector as a deterrent), so what would there be to prevent you from hooking it up to your computer?
I don’t know much about USB protocols, but hacking together a driver to interpret Wiimote data can’t be too complicated. Nintendo might as well embrace the market opportunity and release the drivers themselves, sort of their own version of Boot Camp.
It’s a damn shame that Steve Jobs loves Sony so much, or he’d already be all about licensing the technology for that ever-elusive Mac mini media center. Maybe he’ll be touched, though, by how Nintendo expressed their affection for Apple design when they gave birth to the DS lite and Wii.
Meanwhile… EyeToy Lemmings.
Meanwhile… Clié customers who felt abandoned by Sony are going to be feel quite an itch.
Funny that, I meant to post the exact same thing two days ago. (Minus the drawings. And sexual ambiguity. Only in my case it’s a five-year dry spell, not just fifteen months. And yet I did buy a convertible sofa even though I don’t like those.)
No relation except for the source, Classik TV. You can tell (well, you could if you watched French television) it’s inspired by Grolandsat — I’m not convinced with the font they use for their subtitles (in my opinion silent-like title cards would work better) but I like the idea.
Yum. Well, I’d feel a bit oppressed in thirteen inches, but still.
“Glossy widescreen”? Aren’t screens supposed to be anti-glare these days?
As for the prices, they’re beyond understanding: no Core Solo even though that would allow for an entry-level model under the $1,000 limit, and the black version only exists for the top of the line model and… costs $150 more for the same configuration? ([15:50] Yes, I’m taking into account the BTO option for a bigger hard drive on the white model.) Even if there were a perfectly valid technical explanation (and there has to be… right?) it’d still be utterly absurd.
It’s hard to believe that The Day of Black iBooks Finally is going to become The Day of Seriously Pissed-Off Customers.
And what’s up with the lack of keynote? Is Jobs sick or something?
[15:50] Via AppleInsider,
MacBooks Pro PowerBooks are available with optional “glossy” screens:
Choose the glossy widescreen display to make your graphics, photos, and videos appear with richer color and deeper blacks - great for watching DVD movies. If you prefer a display with anti-glare coating for a matte rather than glossy viewing experience, choose the standard widescreen display.
Wuh? If it boils down to removing the anti-glare screen because it dims contrast a bit, who could seriously want that on their portable computer, and why is it introduced first on the portable line?!
[16:00] Infinite Loop:
The product literature claims that it sports one of those “glossy” screens that are popular with the Windows kids these days.
Ah, it all becomes clearer. I had indeed seen PC portables and didn’t understand why their screens were glossy — I’d supposed it was because they were the cheap thing. Or that Windows users don’t know what’s good for them. Looks like it’s contagious.
And, while I can understand offering it as an option on the Pro portables (I’m all for options — although it’s pretty contrary to the Apple principles of simplifying to the max), what’s the deal with forcing it on the 13-inches?
Primary colors are not a physical but rather a biological concept, based on the physiological response of the human eye to light. Light represents a continuous spectrum of wavelengths, such that being “primary” is not an intrinsic property of the color itself. The human eye contains receptors called cones which normally respond to specific wavelengths of red, green, and blue light. Humans and other species with three such types of color receptors are known as trichromats. […] To generate optimal color ranges for species other than humans, other additive primary colors would have to be used. For species known as tetrachromats with four different color receptors, one would use four primary colors.
In other words, our eye works just like a CCD camera, and our human-engineered TVs and computers wouldn’t quite “work” for birds and marsupials.
Wow, I had no idea.
Just a few weeks ago my Dad asked me why his buddy’s PC laptop had this shiny screen while his PowerBook’s screen was not. I explained that this was for in store sales. I believe that glossy sells better on the show floor, even though in actual use the reflection is worse.
Glossy displays have effectively taken over the entire laptop market. Why are they so popular? Here are three possible reasons.
1. They are better than matte-finish displays.
2. They are cheaper than matte-finish displays.
3. People are idiots. […]
Walking into the laptop aisle, your eye was immediately drawn to the glossy displays. Aside from the shine, there’s also a perceptible difference in sharpness and color saturation on glossy screens. These things stand out.
In “shopping mode,” this is all people see. Shiny, saturated, sharp. Customers aren’t trying to read the screens or move the laptops to different locations in different kinds of lighting. Shopping is almost always an emotional experience, not a rational one.
I’m not sure whether you should blame Steve Jobs’s personal tastes (which is always a possibility) or plain, sad market realities. Apple switching to glossy screens because they’d lose sales to PC laptops due to (erroneous) user perception of display quality. Stores having to display Pro laptops with the glossy screen option, too, to avoid customer complaints that the cheap one looks so much better. Matte screen eventually disappearing from the Apple lineup because nobody buys it. Sad. Sad. Sad. What happened to Apple stubbornly sticking to less popular choices just because they were convinced it was better? It was all true, switching to Intel was one of the first signs of apocalypse.
And I don’t even have theories to account for the keyboard. The more I look at it and read about it, the more it looks and feels like a toy’s keyboard. As cool as the black GlossBook looks, the Apple laptop’s designs is really going the wrong way. (And is the black version really a $150 paint job that tears off at the slightest provocation? I can’t believe that could be true.)
Damn, if only there were an Apple Store in Paris so I didn’t have to judge by photographs. Hey, M., when are you getting yours?
Oh, sure, it’s somehow cute (and the lead actor is more than somehow handsome, which helps) and the sets and soundtrack are impressive, but… the movie is long and boring and doesn’t say anything of interest.
I’d be vaguely interested in seeing what the original book is like. But then, it wouldn’t have Marc-André Grondin. (I already noticed I like French Canadians.)
Collision Detection further documents its obsession with the Uncanny Valley:
The concept is simple: When we look at a cartoon-like drawing of a person, like Charlie Brown, our brains fill in the missing information, and the cartoon seems warm, cute, and lifelike. But when an animated version of a human becomes incredibly close to being real, we start focusing instead on the tiny details that aren’t right. […] Paradoxically, the more realistic the human becomes – the worse they look. […]
The Uncanny Valley effect has become painfully, itchingly obvious in today’s video games. Whenever a game comes out with cartoonish and stylized humans – like the anime-style Final Fantasy series – they look wonderful and lively. But whenever the game designer gets obsessed with being “cinematic” and “superealistic” and producing “cutting edge graphics”, woof woof, meow meow, the results are just unwatchable – as with, say, the “lifelike” characters in Half Life 2 that cavort about like a corpsetastic army of zombies.
After hurling themselves against these shoals and crashing again and again and again and again and again, wouldn’t you imagine that game designers would learn their lesson?
But no. […] They’ve trudged in ever deeper. Check out this clip, in which a young girl does a “casting call” and delivers a long monologue into the camera. Prepare to scream and scream again.
Okay, that one is a particularly awful example (seriously, it takes some effort to make an animated face that horrible), but this post sums up the same thought I’ve had every time I’ve seen a 360 or PS3 game trailer. It is indeed getting worse and worse — and contributes to making me want to buy a Wii.
Ooh, shiny. When I’d seen pictures of the upcoming Apple Store Cubed in New York, I thought that was it: a big, black cube with a white Apple logo, housing the store — like a big 2001 monolith, only thicker and, somehow, more ominous. I had no idea where it was or how big it was, and I didn’t read much about it, because… well, big cube in NYC, good for them, but I want me an effing Paris Apple Store.
Anyway, had I read the articles, I might have known the cube was actually obscured by black plastic to save the surprise. Man. Hottt.
Funny, by the way, that Apple would unveil the Cube today, when everybody is already comparing it to the Louvre Pyramid, and Da Vinci Code opened in France yesterday and opens in the US tomorrow. If Steve Jobs is a closet Dan Brown fan, I’ll… I’ll… well, he better release an iPodTablet for me to forgive him.
(Incidentally, I think the original 2001 script — the one that featured a science-fiction story — featured a cube, not a monolith. And transparent, not black. Figures. All that’s missing now is a three-story Justin Long hologram instructing passersby
how to kill a PC user with a mere rock or stick how to use a GlossBook while avoiding glare from the big Apple logo. Big Apple. Hah.)
The latest evidence that Steve Jobs is as wacko as his detractors paint him: a mere three days after the iBook has been replaced by a 13-inch Core Duo laptop with a glossy screen
and the first ever black paint job on an Apple computer, Apple’s home page prominently displays… the New York Apple Store (now with a neat time-lapse animation). You know, that place that’s just made to sell computers. (And iPods). Guess which of the two occasions was worthy of Steve’s presence?
But then, the store is a cube, whereas the MacBook… well, it has the right number of faces and corners, but it definitely doesn’t abide by the jobsian golden number.
A comment on The Mac Observer (on an article suggesting that the next top of the line will be a pizza-box media center — nevermind that nobody has a big CRT monitor to place on top of a pizza box, and incidentally the reason towers are so big is that professionals need expandability):
Come on people. This is Apple we’re talking about. Steve Jobs. You know, the guy who designed the NeXT cube. The guy who designed the G4 Cube. The guy who already showed his hand on what the next Apple desktop will look like when he designed this.
Got to wonder how the iPod, and particularly the shuffle, evaded that trend. Maybe, if Steve Jobs wore baggy pants rather than tight jeans…
JungleDisk [via] is a cross-platform (Windows / OS X / Linux) free beta program that lets you use Amazon S3 as an iDisk equivalent — that is, transparently accessible encrypted off-site file storage for $0.15 per GB-month of storage and $0.20 per GB of bandwidth (billed directly by Amazon).
There are several alternatives we are considering as well [short of royalties from Amazon], but it’s safe to assume that:
- There won’t be a subscription fee to Jungle Disk itself.
- A basic level of functionality will always be free. We aren’t going to lock anyone out of their data!
In addition, we’ve published open source code that demonstrates how Jungle Disk stores and retrieves data from S3. Several other developers are already planning on making their S3 utilities Jungle Disk-compatible.
That’s huge. Much more interesting, and reliable, than the Gmail filesystem hacks. (Well, yeah, less free, too. But that’s why it’s more reliable.) And I’m still wondering why Amazon didn’t release such a program themselves right away — maybe they saved that for later, rolling out S3 more progressively by initially targeting web developers?
For two months now I’ve been walking all the way North of République to the Chinese supermarket, and what do I see tonight coming home from some shopping? Two “Supermarché Volta” trucks covered with ideograms — turns out there are three Asian supermarkets in the same street, one hundred meters away from my building. And one of the three doesn’t stink. Despite the presence of a butcher. That’s something.
I’m also glad I finally tried the Tunisian restaurant that’s too doors away from my home. It’s always nice living near a good, cheap restaurant. Of course, a sushi place would be better for my diet, but there are already plenty of those in the neighborhood anyway.
And let’s finish on a desperate note: it’s late May already. Almost June. After which is July, and then August, and a deserted Paris. And then it’s Christmas. A whole year past and I’ve done nothing!
I’ve got to hire friends so I can go out (now that I have roughly enough money to buy myself some drinks, and more than enough work to justify getting drunk in bars). But I’ve never quite known how one does that. You’ve got to start by fucking them, that’s how it’s done in the gay world, right?
I know they established right from the start he was the village idiot, but that’s still too much.
Benefits of Removing ‘www’ From Your URL: I never really cared about the issue of redirecting ‘www.example.com’ to ‘example.com’, or the opposite, because I don’t agree with the general tendency in that matter and hence didn’t feel the need to waste CPU cycles on RewriteEngine, but that post makes the compelling argument PageRank dilution. So I just edited my httpd.conf to add ‘www’ for anyone who forgets to put it (and for some reason, unlike this blogger or John Gruber, I had to remove the trailing slash from before ‘$1’ — maybe an Apache version issue?).
Why do I prefer to homogenize on ‘www’ rather than without? Because, basically, people are already equating web and internet enough without adding that bit of confusion. How do you write your web page address on your business card / your T-shirt / a bar coaster? Writing just ‘example.com’ is imprecise; ‘http://example.com/’ is awkward; ‘www.example.com’ is just perfect, and anyone, as unexperienced as they are, instantly recognizes it for what it is.
(You’ll tell me that ‘example.com’ is clear enough, and who cares about users confusing web and internet? Sure — but how clear and fool-proof is ‘ff00aa.com’ by itself? Okay, there’s still dot-com, but what if it were another suffix? How self-evident would something like ‘ff00aa.tv’ be, for instance?)
Black GlossBooks don’t normally have crappy, flakey paint jobs; it’s just that there’s been a inordinate number of lemons among early production models. In a world where each customer is a reviewer with a potential audience in the millions, maybe it’s time for Apple to investigate that ‘quality control’ concept and quit having its hardware beta-tested by early adopters? Oh well, who am I kidding — as long as it sells…
Lovely Apple Store Fifth Avenue QTVR panorama. (No direct link because that page resizes browser windows.)
Infinite zoom. Cool. But it would be so much cooler if the zooming were seamless.
Dans le genre taré, ça se pose là. J’ai lancé Firefox parce que je pensais que c’était un problème de compatibilité avec Safari avant de cliquer sur le bouton “En savoir plus”, pour voir — parce que cette nouvelle débilité n’est pas le moins du monde annoncée.
Bordel de cons. Et la cerise sur le gâteau, c’est le formulaire de contact :
Rhaaaaaa. Je vais aller ouvrir un compte épargne à la Poste, moi.
P.S. Aaaaargh c’est contagieux. Qu’est-ce qu’ils ont tous, aujourd’hui ?
Short emails rule. When I get an email that’s several pages long, I have to make some decisions: do I have time to handle this now? Is it important enough to come back to? Can I pass it on to someone else? If I can’t say yes to any of these, I will probably never get back to it. […] Supporting material or other important info can be attached, but keep it separate from who you are, what your issue is, and what you want from me. […]
[If you’re] getting a lot of responses asking, “What do you mean?” context is your problem. When you’re asking a question, anticipate any missing details that could cause an extended back-and-forth. Each time someone sends you a reply, you’ve gone to the back of that person’s line. Do what you can to make your emails count the first time. […]
Make your requests clear. […] You should set them apart from the rest of the message by paring them down to one sentence, with white space before and after. […]
Don’t give people an excuse to misread you. If you’ve written a request at the end of a long paragraph, or been passive (“it’d be nice if somebody could…”), it’s likely to have been missed on the receiver’s end. If you sent an email, you have a point. Get to it.
Apple Store, Fifth Avenue - MacBook Winners Gallery [via]. Die! Die! Die!
I’m hesitant about the “DarthBook” appellation — sure, it sounds cool, but isn’t it too obvious? Plus, who still wants to provide George Lucas with free advertisement by now? “GlossBook” isn’t quite as cool, but at least it has a reason to be.
Samsung laptop with 32GB flash drive. Sure it’s a $900 premium to end up with a 32GB drive, but given Steve Jobs’s obsession with all things teeny and silent I still don’t understand how Apple didn’t premiere that technology. Plus, they have a volume discount on flash memory — but then, Samsung is the one actually manufacturing the chips, so maybe it does make sense for them to try and get this market started. Anyway, for such sexy technology, their laptop is particularly fugly.
Black-and-white MacBook. “
Now let’s see a lid color swap and we’ll call this project complete.”
DashCode? Isn’t it a bit too late for Apple to introduce their own Dashboard development environment? Seems to me what little excitement there may have been has passed now.
The making of Apple iPod+Nike Sport Kit: “
Other technical challenges [designing the sensor embedded in the new Nike Moire] centered on the duration of the battery power (close to 1,000 hours).” What? How on earth does the shoe not convert the energy from running into electricity?
Mac Slapping: “
I find it highly amusing that the sudden motion sensor in recent Mac portables, added to prevent damage to hard drive in the event of a drop, has lead to a trend of people slapping, swinging, and generally flailing their computers around.” Agreed — I’d never, ever consider playing with MacSaber if I owned a MacBook.
Blearrrrgh. Plus, retcon, retcon, retcon, and the worst kind — Rambaldi and Lena Olin were the best two things to ever happen to this show; we already knew that Abrams considered Rambaldi like a diversion that had taken way too much importance over the real subject (i.e., Jennifer Garner with tears in her eyes), but I can’t help thinking that the massacre of Irina’s character is nothing more than a (possibly subconscious) revenge against the actress because she didn’t care to get more involved in the show.
In any case, those Lost fans can’t pretend there’ll be a satisfactory resolution anymore now.
Nintendo Wii to have voice-over-IP support? Can you believe just how much cooler the $200 system will be than all others? The PS3 better have videophone functionality with EyeToy, for the price.
(And, yeah, I realize we have reached Apple levels of speculation around the Wii. Goes to show: all you have to do is cover your appliance with shiny white plastic and enjoy the free publicity.)
Dropped by the Fnac today, to check out the MacBook. You can’t play at all with computers there (keyboards are locked under thick acrylic panes) but (a) gee, that’s too tiny a screen for anything serious, how could people ever really want to use a 12-inch PowerBook, and even complain that the 13-inch MacBook is too big? and (b) compared to a nearby MacBook Pro, screen reflections are insane. I don’t care how much brighter and more saturated images are (incidentally, the vertical viewing angle seemed rather poor), I don’t want that on my computer, ever.
Google releases Picasa for Linux. (Picasa is the iPhoto clone for Windows that Google acquired a year or two ago. Funny thing that nobody could ever really figure out why they bought it, and their strategy regarding it still evades me. Clearly, it wasn’t so much about using Hello’s technology in a hypothetical Google instant messenger.)
Okay, it’s more like a Wine-compatible edition of the Windows program (plus 200 hundred patches contributed to the Wine codebase), but still — wow, and, also, what the hell? Are they just throwing darts at a spinning wheel nowadays to decide which projects to give time and money to? Or are they really just placing their pawns to launch their great offensive against Microsoft? (If so, they should probably revise their strategy and not base it on Wine.)
Microsoft and file formats, that’s a bit like… Microsoft and any other technology: scary. They lost the WMA vs. AAC battle because they had no leverage on the music player business (plus I suppose most Windowsians want to use anything but Windows Media Player to listen to their music — from what I’ve seen, the next version will lift enough UI from iTunes to remedy that); they only decided to (let a third-party) release WMV codecs for the Mac when they realized they just weren’t going to win that fight either (maybe because too many webdesigners were on Macs, hence using Quicktime to publish videos, which Apple hadn’t neglected to distribute to Windows users — and pirated videos used DivX, and now everyone uses web-based cross-platform solutions); even though they had not proprietary format to push on that front yet, they managed to block PNG adoption just by being too lazy to implement alpha channels in MSIE. Why aren’t I thrilled that they’re going after a new target now?
On the one hand, WMPhoto has even more reason to fail than WMV did, considering the stronghold Apple has over the webdesign market; but you can expect that format to be used in Windows Vista to save and publish a user’s photographs — not to mention Office documents. Sure, considering the tangled mess of image format patents, having a big player step in and define a new format for the whole world’s sake is nice — if it’s anyone but Microsoft, please!
Ha! As soon as I found out about CoverFlow (cool OS X utility that lets you browse through your CD collection, with lovely 3D effects), I thought it was a shame it didn’t take song ratings into account, and damn would it be cool to have a program display all my albums with an average rating of three stars or more, especially now that I’ve got 100GB of music.
Well, turs out CoverFlow can do just that — only instead of an easily accessible and easily changeable menu option it’s in the preferences and you won’t find it if you don’t look for it (I know I didn’t, until today).
Now I can really browse a collection of my favorite records as if I were looking through my shelves — allowing me to rediscover records I had forgotten, whereas with Clutter I ended up only listening to the twenty or so records I had thought to put on my desktop.
I still wish there was a way to move through the collection faster, like having the covers form a two-dimensional matrix that moves faster as your mouse moves toward the edges, but… ooh, the scrollwheel works, too!
Thank heavens nobody seems to have listened — neither have I, actually, can’t gather the courage. I’ll do better next time. (Hadn’t done better in the Netizen magazine interview… but that time I had been too busy to meet with the journalist, and I basically said the opposite of what he intended to write.)
As usual, episode ratings are relative to the overall show’s quality and indicate how enjoyable they are rather than how good — in other words, this show is still crap, but that was a pretty good season finale, considering.
Remember a few weeks back when two women died on Alias and the same happened on Lost on the same night? Now the season finales leave the two shows’ most enjoyable male characters respectively dead (well, one undead) in an blown-up underground tomb, and presumably dead in a blown-up bunker. (Of course, the Lost episodes weren’t as poorly written as the Alias ones.) I think they’re trying to tell us something. It’s all real. Can’t be coincidences.
Former Genius says thermal paste quantity doesn’t seem to change much of anything to MacBook temperatures, and why would it matter anyway since excess paste will be squished aside when everything is pressed shut (makes sense), and how unexpected can it be that Steve Jobs would have his laptop firmwares design so that he’d rather scald his lap than hear fans spin?
Apple Store Fifth Avenue elevator freezes. Nevermind that you gotta admit it’s an apt metaphor for Rev. A Apple hardware, what puzzles me is that the people who got stuck in a glass case for 45 minutes reportedly didn’t receive any compensation whatsoever. What kind of business practices is that?!
AllYouCanUpload: upload your images there, and display them on your blog, forum or whatever — nothing new, except it’s all free, there’s no upload or bandwidth limit, and you don’t even need to register.
Not sure whether “
You can [only] post photographs you have taken or other images you have created” is just the usual legal disclaimer or they really intend to enforce it, though (I have little doubt that the ban on pornography will be enforced, however). Still, a completely free image hosting service that’s part of CNET networks and doesn’t even require registration or your e-mail address, that’s pretty nice.
INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE. Yay. Had no idea. Should read the release notes more often. “
30% speedup should be typical.” I’m glad I upgraded the new webserver to MySQL 4.
[Todd Benjamin, director of Apple portables worldwide,] is clear on this point: Black is cool, and the black-as-coal version is aimed at MacBook fans who want something a little exclusive (and who might miss the now-discontinued diminuitive PowerBook).
“We looked at the user who was buying our 12-in. PowerBook, who wants the smallest laptop Apple makes and wants a professional look,” he said. “It is black throughout. There is not one grey accent that got left on there. It’s a subtle approach that’ll appeal to the professional user. It’s kind of the ultimate MacBook.”
Okay, I’m not quite sure here — on the one hand, he emphasizes the attention to detail (such as the plastic inside USB ports being black, not white or grey), which does understandably cost money; on the other, he’s so unapologetic about the cost, you’d think Apple really has no good reason for the $150 price hike other than making a cooler version for pretentious bastards.
And it’s not like “the user who was buying a 12-inch PowerBook” might want a non-crappy video chip, or a 7200-rpm hard drive, or even more minimum RAM — nah, I’m pretty sure it’s just about the paint job.
He compared the new LCDs to TV screens, many of which also have a shiny coating that brings vibrancy to whatever’s showing. The comparison is apt.
Oh, I’m sure it’s apt: most people certainly use their laptops in the dark, like they watch DVDs on their home cinema; plus, 13 inches is totally the most common form factor for LCD TVs. Yeah.
I’m a bit scared — this guy is just a marketing rep, right, not someone involved in any decision-making?