FREN

Garoo


13 may 2006

Lost 2.21  

It was off a good start — the two of them are cool together, and there was to be an important discovery.

<SPOILERS>

Yet in fact there wasn’t, and it referenced one of the most prominent theories without confirming or contradicting it, and brought the whole hatch situation back to status quo by the end of the episode. Strangely reminiscent of the first season’s second half, when they multiplied red herrings in order to confuse the viewer into thinking that was a deep, mysterious story.

</SPOILERS>

Want to know when I post new content to my blog? It's a simple as registering for free to an RSS aggregator (Feedly, NewsBlur, Inoreader, …) and adding www.garoo.net to your feeds (or www.garoo.net if you want to subscribe to all my topics). We don't need newsletters, and we don't need Twitter; RSS still exists.

Matthieu, 7 years ago:

Quand tu racontes comme ça on dirait que tu n'aimes pas la série...

garoo, 7 years ago:

Ah oui ? C'est étrange :)

Matthieu, 7 years ago:

Pourtant tu continues de regarder ? Curieux ?

garoo, 7 years ago:

Si je ne regardais que des chefs d'oeuvres, je me ferais gravement chier.

Daria, 7 years ago:

Ca dépend de ce que tu fais en dehors. J'ai découvert que plus je fais / vois de trucs et moins j'ai le temps de les commenter sur mon blog, et en fait c'est plutôt un soulagement.

Marrant, hein?

Legal information: This blog is hosted par OVH, 2 rue Kellermann, 59100 Roubaix, France, www.ovhcloud.com.

Personal data about this blog's readers are not used nor transmitted to third-parties. Comment authors can request their deletion by e-mail.

All contents © the author or quoted under fair use.