FREN

Garoo


4 jul. 2006

The Interpreter (2005)  

Rather inconsequential. Why is it that, whenever a director obtains something rather unique, like the authorizations to shoot a movie almost entirely within the UN premises (which might as well have been rebuilt in a studio, considering what little good it makes to the movie), the final movie isn’t a masterpiece? It it only because, in order to obtain that, you have to be an old director on a downward slope?

Anyway, it’s not too bad either; just slower than necessary, less intense than should be, and the absurd coincidences the whole movie relies on are never actually justified.

Want to know when I post new content to my blog? It's a simple as registering for free to an RSS aggregator (Feedly, NewsBlur, Inoreader, …) and adding www.garoo.net to your feeds (or www.garoo.net if you want to subscribe to all my topics). We don't need newsletters, and we don't need Twitter; RSS still exists.

rhino75, 7 years ago:

Crikey Garoo, you took your time getting round to this one - even I've seen it!! Like you say, I found it to be pleasantly entertaining, but no more. I liked the UN bits, tho' - I came out convinced I should have been an interpreter (but not a freedom fighter). So a job half well done.

Lolfr, 7 years ago:

J'aime bien (enfin, façon de parler) la manière dont il évacue ça. Quand Sean Penn lors du premier interrogatoire, demande à la belle si elle ne trouve pas toutes ces coïncidences suspectes…

garoo, 7 years ago:

Oui... dans un film d'aliens ou de zombies, ça me suffirait, comme explication, mais pas dans un thriller à contexte politique, les standards ne sont pas vraiment les mêmes.

Legal information: This blog is hosted par OVH, 2 rue Kellermann, 59100 Roubaix, France, www.ovhcloud.com.

Personal data about this blog's readers are not used nor transmitted to third-parties. Comment authors can request their deletion by e-mail.

All contents © the author or quoted under fair use.