No rating for this movie, because I’d have to see it again first: right now I’d be tempted to say the script is completely incoherent, but I’m not quite certain. In any case, even if there were no proven incoherence, it would still be the kind of movie ending that makes you reflexively go “fucking rip-off” rather than “whoa,”, and that’s not good.
A pity, because it’s well written, directed and played. (Which is why I’m holding my judgment, because the writer-director seems too intelligent to make the kind of gross mistakes he lets you think he did.)
Want to know when I post new content to my blog? It's a simple as registering for free to an RSS aggregator (Feedly, NewsBlur, Inoreader, …) and adding www.garoo.net to your feeds (or www.garoo.net if you want to subscribe to all my topics). We don't need newsletters, and we don't need Twitter; RSS still exists.
Pheel, 7 years ago:
Heu il existe au cinéma des règles immuables :
Un film avec Sophie Marceau ne peut être bon.
C'est comme ça. Comme 1 et 1 font 2, Sophie Marceau fait des navets.
Bruno, 7 years ago:
Pour l'avoir vu pendant un vol de jour de 12 heures entre l'Age de glace et Vidéo Gag, je le classe au rang de chefs-d'oeuvre (chefs-d'oeuvres ? chef-d'oeuvres ?). Tout est relatif, comme disait l'autre.
garoo, 7 years ago:
Est-ce que tu sous-entendrais que L'âge de glace n'est pas un chef d'oeuvre ?
Legal information: This blog is hosted par OVH, 2 rue Kellermann, 59100 Roubaix, France, www.ovhcloud.com.
Personal data about this blog's readers are not used nor transmitted to third-parties. Comment authors can request their deletion by e-mail.
All contents © the author or quoted under fair use.
Zéro Janvier, 7 years ago: